1. 08:06 10th Feb 2012

    notes: 9

    comments:

    reblogged from: infoneer-pulse

    For example, among 18- to 34-year-olds 24 percent have taken unpaid internships for work experience and 35 percent go back to school to get a job. This all translates to 24 percent of Americans in that age bracket moving back in with their parents — a stat which jumps to 34 percent for the narrower group of 25- to 29-year-olds.
     
  2. 06:22 9th Feb 2012

    notes: 16

    comments:

    reblogged from: msg

    My favorite personalities stopped speaking to each other and started speaking to a faceless mass…the concept of an audience replaced the faces in the community….twitter became a microphone instead of a public walkytalky…
    — One day I woke up and twitter sucked « Jordan Cooper’s Blog: startups, venture capital, Hyperpublic (via msg)

    I stopped using Twitter in 2010 for exactly this reason. Tumblr, Techmeme, Facebook, and NYTimes.com are where I get news on current events and engage with people I care about.

    What’s interesting is to consider why this happened and what Twitter could have done differently. How do you create a healthy culture for your social network? A community manager role? Maybe Twitter was doomed to evolve to this point inevitably, given how much narcissism and ego drive Twitter content creation.

     
  3. 22:31 8th Feb 2012

    notes: 29

    comments:

    reblogged from: taylorlorenz

    taylorlorenz:

    Battlestar Galactica - Portlandia on IFC

    My favorite show referencing my other favorite show, too real. 

    Guilty. So guilty.

     
  4. 22:16

    notes: 1

    comments:

    reblogged from: gsiener

    gsiener:

    Impressive story.

    Original weekend project mvp link on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2406614

    (via Gumroad Gets $1.1 Million From Chris Sacca, Max Levchin And Others To Turn Any Link Into A Payment System | TechCrunch)

    Holy shit this is brilliant. Wow. Changes everything.

     
  5. 20:31

    notes: 9

    comments:

    reblogged from: infoneer-pulse

    image: download

    infoneer-pulse:

Google paying users to track 100% of their Web usage via little black box

Google is working to collect information about Internet users that it can’t get from just monitoring its own browser, services, and Android devices. The company has set up a new program called Screenwise, which offers money to users who install a black box on their home network to “measure Internet use.” A smaller amount of money will go to those who install a browser extension on their computers that will do the same thing.
Google quietly started up the Screenwise data collection program Tuesday night, taking the e-mail addresses of people who are interested in “add[ing] a browser extension that will share with Google the sites you visit and how you use them.” For their participation, Google offers the extension users a $5 Amazon gift card for signing up and another $5 gift card for every three months they stay with the program. Less publicly, Google also started looking for people who would install a piece of hardware on their network to do more extensive monitoring.

» via ars technica

What’s your privacy worth?

    infoneer-pulse:

    Google paying users to track 100% of their Web usage via little black box

    Google is working to collect information about Internet users that it can’t get from just monitoring its own browser, services, and Android devices. The company has set up a new program called Screenwise, which offers money to users who install a black box on their home network to “measure Internet use.” A smaller amount of money will go to those who install a browser extension on their computers that will do the same thing.

    Google quietly started up the Screenwise data collection program Tuesday night, taking the e-mail addresses of people who are interested in “add[ing] a browser extension that will share with Google the sites you visit and how you use them.” For their participation, Google offers the extension users a $5 Amazon gift card for signing up and another $5 gift card for every three months they stay with the program. Less publicly, Google also started looking for people who would install a piece of hardware on their network to do more extensive monitoring.

    » via ars technica

    What’s your privacy worth?

     
  6. 19:47

    notes: 515

    comments:

    reblogged from: playfullyseductive

    georgecocksman:

    This is what it might look like if guys and girls switched roles.

    “Tacofest”

     
  7. 18:25

    notes: 14383

    comments:

    reblogged from: elspethjane

    photojojo:

    There’s something about caffeine and high-speed photography that just meshes well.

    (Photos by Jack Long)

    High-Speed Photos of Coffee Splashes

    via Mudwerks

     
  8. 17:45

    notes: 18

    comments:

    How Tumblr Should Do Promoted Posts

    Thoughts expressed in this post are derived from conversations with Julie Fredrickson and Greg Battle.

    As you all have seen, Tumblr recently began playing with the idea of publishers paying $1 to highlight posts in the stream. As I said then, I’m glad Tumblr is experimenting, and every time a community-based site makes changes, it always runs the risk of backlash, so kudos to them for having the fortitude to try new things.

    With that said, who is it for? Regular users who tumble for fun about cats and last night’s dinner? Brands like Newsweek and Vogue? The $1 price points to “it’s for everyone” but the nature of announcements & promotions is dominated by organizations with an agenda. Given the desire of the latter group, I’d make them the focus.

    If we were to start from scratch and think about how organizations could best promote their posts while maintaining the integrity of the Tumblr eco-system, I think we should take a page from Facebook’s Sponsored Stories. In the right rail of the dashboard, underneath (or instead of) the Radar, Tumblr should show a post by someone you already follow if they’ve paid to have their post featured there. The purpose is to reinforce the message of the post in case you missed it or forgot about it. Advertisers can pay more for more impressions, which is exactly what they want. Users don’t feel like they are being spammed, because they only see posts by people they already choose to follow. And Tumblr finally gets to monetize what they have in abundance - dashboard page views (hundreds of millions every day).

     
  9. 16:13

    notes: 8

    comments:

    reblogged from: courtenaybird

    Pinterest already is driving buyers to some websites. In the last six months, the retail deal site ideeli.com has seen a 446 percent increase in web traffic from Pinterest and sales resulting from those visits have increased five-fold.
    — 

    How Pinterest Is Becoming the Next Big Thing in Social Media for Business — Entrepreneur.com (via courtenaybird)

    Wish they posted some absolute numbers here. Pinterest’s growth has been so fast that 446% increase sounds silly because it is silly (it was still tiny 6 months ago). But kudos to Pinterest and hopefully more articles like this will make sites like Tumblr / Facebook / Twitter to realize that the future of e-commerce lies with them.

     
  10. 16:10

    notes: 37

    comments:

    reblogged from: parislemon

    parislemon:

    As an iOS lover and Path champion, a number of folks have asked for my take on the Path address book situation of yesterday and today. I’ve avoided weighing in for two reasons: first, I wanted to talk to some other actual developers about the situation. Second, the fact that CrunchFund is…

    Actually, it does call into question Path’s company culture with respect to privacy. Any engineer worth their salt knows to never store passwords in plaintext. Instead, you store a hash of the password. Then, when you validate if the supplied password from a login page is correct, you hash the proposed password and check it with the hash you have stored and see if they match.

    In Path’s case, they probably do that with passwords but don’t with other personal data. Why? Because they don’t see it as deserving the same level of privacy. Should they? Clearly some think so.

    Personally, I’m not upset and think the public reaction here is typical of Internet nerd libertarians who are way too sensitive about whether or not their “rights” are being infringed upon. If you don’t like it, don’t use it. Anyway, just pointing out that thoughtful product design requires total immersion in the mind of the user, including how they think about privacy / integrity / relationships / trust / etc.